Samsung Galaxy S Neocore benchmark
21
Jul/1025
Jul/1025
The new Samsung Galaxy S running Neocore beside a Nexus One and HTC Desire both on Android 2.1.
Comments (25)
Trackbacks (0) ( subscribe to comments on this post )
Leave a comment
No trackbacks yet.
Blog Sponsors
1:28 am on July 21st, 2010
@rickysio
Tell that to my Galaxy S that benches higher than the Snapdragon in both Linpack and Benchmark Pi.
1:38 am on July 21st, 2010
oouuuu, nice score on samsung, i think it’s best score ever
i get 40.3 fps on my LG GT540
2:08 am on July 21st, 2010
haha i love samsung i9000
2:30 am on July 21st, 2010
@x2×3x2
I compared the two head by head, so no need to inform myself anymore.
But yeah you are right. It’s relative.
But even with the higher pixel density of the iP4 the galaxy S has the better video quality. (IMHO and the HO of many others I asked wich one they would prefer in vid showing both of the phones).
If it comes to text in the web mostly the text is far too tiny to read it on the iP4 . So most ppl have to zoom in anyway. eBooks seems a little bit more “printed” on the iP4.
3:13 am on July 21st, 2010
@alexanderdenztore im pretty sure u can overclock one to 1.2ghzzzz
4:05 am on July 21st, 2010
I had a feeling I should wait unti upgrading to a higher end android phone(I have a g1)..the galaxy s was worth the wait… Now maybe we can have some good 3d games…dare I say, an attachable controller??
4:51 am on July 21st, 2010
@Mentor501 Similarly, you probably should do the same yourself bro. Better screen in this case is relative? Better for videos? Better for text/web? The Galaxy S is better in terms of color rendition, contrast and saturation. While the iPhone 4 allows reading text on web clearly without zooming it due to higher pixel density. So in terms of screen, there’re pro’s and con’s for both.
5:42 am on July 21st, 2010
galaxy wins
5:56 am on July 21st, 2010
very impressive
6:33 am on July 21st, 2010
this result is obvius since the galaxy has a graphics card and the other two dont. It isnt processor problem…. -.- Anyway, i dont think im going to play games on phones. For that you have psp or NDS or a notebook…
7:12 am on July 21st, 2010
@latinostar94
Das Galaxy S ist das beste Smartphone. Es hat die mit Abstand schnellste Hardware, hat dank s-Amoled Technick das beste Display, trotz der etwas höheren Auflösung vom iP4, die beste Kamera und die größte Ausstattung wenn es um Dinge wie FM Transm., Blutooth etc. pp. geht.
Einzige Alternativen wären da das Desire welches aber wesentlich langsamer ist, und das Wave S8500 welches zwar baugleich zum Galaxy ist (auch wenn das Display nur 3.3 inch misst) aber Bada als OS hat.
7:30 am on July 21st, 2010
@chickcarle
Please inform yourself before posting.
The Galaxy S is the best smartphone on the market. Also the Display is better (even without higher res.) than the display of the iP4.
7:49 am on July 21st, 2010
Has anyone done similar tests for SGS vs Iphone 4 ? It would be interesting to see how I4 performs in such tests ?
8:34 am on July 21st, 2010
@alexanderdenztore
And that, for the CPU, happens to be bullshit. Clock for clock Snapdragon CPU is 5% faster than Cortex A8.
GPU wise… Well, Qualcomm has never caught up with the times yet. Adreno 200 is positively outdated.
9:21 am on July 21st, 2010
@alexanderdenztore
And that, for the CPU, happens to be bullshit. Clock for clock Snapdragon CPU is 5% faster than Cortex A8.
GPU wise… Well, Qualcomm has never caught up with the times yet. Adreno 200 is positively outdated.
9:53 am on July 21st, 2010
@chickcarle i also think that iphone 4 is awesome….but its expensive …i don’t have so much money!!…xDxD
10:13 am on July 21st, 2010
I would get the iPhone 4 because it’s aswsome and holy shit that guy has three hands
11:03 am on July 21st, 2010
hey…i was thinking of getting the nexus one or htc desire or samsung galaxy. i currently have an iphone 3g, but i really like the enhaced specs, namely the screen resolution, of these 3 phones. Can you give me an honest comparison between the three?? in terms of games, calls, texting, calender usage, music, rooting, web usage, photos, etc. ….I’m sorry for all the questions lol, but i just want the opinion of somebody with the device. So can you give me a intelligent comparison?? thanks again
11:40 am on July 21st, 2010
@alexanderdenztore
You’ll never achieve good graphics performance out of any Qualcomm-based chipsets. Quality GPU performance and Qualcomm just do not add up to a valid equation.
12:04 pm on July 21st, 2010
My goodness… the fact that we can achieve the sort of graphics on modern cell phones that early game consoles were striving to put out is a testament to how far technology has really come. Badass!
12:54 pm on July 21st, 2010
Droid X performed about 10% on most benchmark tests, except for the Linpack test in which both phones averaged 8 mflops.
1:35 pm on July 21st, 2010
Samsungやりおる。
2:18 pm on July 21st, 2010
I get 28.9 fps on my nexus one with froyo 2.2… overclocked to 1113mhz.
3:15 pm on July 21st, 2010
@ConceptVBS ???? Yes they are at a slight disadvantage. This is why you’ll see at most a 2-3 month wait. For most consumers, they probably won’t care. Unfortunately, you misunderstand what an SOC is from the get go. The Device manufacturer has the option to take out, and add whatever they want to the SOC design. Hence the manufacturer still has the customisation options available to them. The advantages are slight since you’ll see the new processors very soon, perhaps a month or 2 after.
3:37 pm on July 21st, 2010
@sabeerkibria
Isnt that EXACTLY what people want? A low latency processor/ motherboard?
Then by definition all other smartphone manufacturers already have a disadvantage right from the get go as the chipsets from TI and Qualcomm is designed to be used by high volume customers with no customization ability on the part of the phone manufacturers. (Unless your a caliber of Samsung’s size)